Incidentally, that is a criticism also leveled at psychiatrists, who are trained medical doctors and scientists. Like making people “happier” isn’t a scientific outcome, even though it can make a huge qualitative difference to someone’s life – though the outcome could largely be seen as “subjective” and not objective – or as subjective viewpoints of those who witness someone recovering from major depressive disorder, for example.

Yet “objective” research has shown psychiatrists to be more effective at what they do than any other medical specialists.

A review of Rose’s website or her books on reading faces provides the astute investigator and the public with evidence of accuracy.

The prior comment in this thread made me think about intuition of all types. Intuition is subjective, based on one’s perception. Nevertheless, the accuracy of intuition can be measured with scientific and mathemetical precision, thereby providing “scientific or empirical evidence” of intuition.

For example, Norm Sheely, M.D. did extensive measuring and testing of the medical intuition abilities of Caroline Myss.

Evidently he has shown it a lot in dealings politically; it’s not just a face reader’s secret. But now you have the satisfaction of seeing where this very serious pattern shows on his face.