Being Too Good a Sport about Cords of Attachment
April 8th, 2008 by Rose Rosetree
In the realms of intuitive reading, I wonder if sometimes people are just too good a sport for their own good. And “Yearning for Zion” isn’t just a cult compound in Texas. A more everyday example is Meg’s experience with a healer who cut cords of attachment.
As part of a different thread, Meg commented about a session that didn’t seem to produce any results for her:
I wouldn’t be able to make an informed comment about the competency of the healer helped me to cut ties during my session. However I didn’t receive any feeling from this person that they were claiming to be something more than they were either.
It does come to mind that not everything in this life is within our control, so the level of healing we receive at the time may be more appropriate for us than we think, or may be preparing us for something much deeper. Whatever the case one would hope we are all here to help one another to reach a common goal.
How modest to say that she can’t make an “informed comment”! Folks, when you go to a healer and receive no results except that, during your session, the minutes on your watch ticked by… well, who would be better informed than you to make a comment?
Other people may have wonderful benefits from consulting with “Mme. Fifi,” but what if you don’t? Then it isn’t being a bad sport to acknowledge that she isn’t a good healer for you at this time. And if she claimed to do a certain type of healing on you, maybe you got a wish more than that type of healing.
The whole culture of mind-body-spirit is wonderfully accepting. But I just go wild when I read statements like, “so the level of healing we receive at the time may be more appropriate for us than we think, or may be preparing us for something much deeper. Whatever the case one would hope we are all here to help one another to reach a common goal.”
Whatever happened to good old consumer smarts? As a practitioner in the emerging technology of cutting cords of attachment, I find an alarming lack of professionalism. Let’s say that a healer tells you that she is cutting a cord of attachment that you have to your father.
That’s a big deal. Or should be. It could change your life. And if you have no results? Here is what you should know:
Many psychics and healers who claim to cut cords have such limited skills and knowledge that they are wasting everyone’s time.
Alas, many such healers are expert at OTHER things and assume that, as if by pure wish fulfillment, they have become qualified experts at cutting cords. Folks, this is a form of psychic level surgery on energy fields. It is not a cute hobby for dilettantes, nor is this a two-minute job handled by a sweet but ineffectual prayer.
Using Deeper Perception, or common sense, or both, you can sort through bogus claims to use this powerful healing technology. You might wish to read my how-to book, Cut Cords of Attachment, not necessarily to learn to cut cords on your own but simply because you aim to make yourself a wiser consumer.
Find out what is really involved here! Any aspect of doing aura readings isn’t hard. A kid can do it. (In the above photo, my kid was doing it, back when he was about eight years old.)
I think of “Lois,” a very sweet Reiki practitioner, even a Reiki master who teaches on a regular basis. As part of doing a healing for my friend “Ross,” as a kind of throwaway statement, Lois said, “And would you like me to cut your cords?”
Ross is familiar with quality experiences of cutting cords of attachment. So he was surprised. He asked, “Oh, how long would that take?”
Lois replied, “Just a few minutes.”
He declined this dubious honor. Chatting with Lois as she continued to work on him, he mentioned that I take a full 55-minute session to facilitate cutting one cord of attachment and there is a great deal of information that emerges as part of a healing process.
Lois apparently shrugged. Apparently she wasn’t curious to learn more. Apparently she likes her routine, and she likes taking a few minutes every day to “cut her cords.” It’s one of many skills that she dabbles with, like wearing charms on a charm bracelet. But what about all the clients for whom she does this kind of “healing”? Of course they are unlikely to receive any results beyond the placebo effect.
Meg, the good sport, wrote: However I didn’t receive any feeling from this person that they were claiming to be something more than they were either.
When it comes to aura readings and energy work, be a smart consumer. You don’t need to feel scared to question the training and skills of someone works on you. Demanding professionalism doesn’t make you “negative” or “a bad sport.”
Objectively, does the person say he/she is going to cut cords of attachment? Objectively, do you get results in your life? Yes or no?
It seems to me for a long time we really have seen this method or methods of healing as more of a parlor trick so our expectations have been low. Although most of us have experienced some sort of energetic healing we may not have recognised it as such. For myself I have experienced healers in training in which a little changed for awhile but not in a lasting way. It is exciting to me that Rose is asking for us to be smart consumers, it enriches and legitimises the whole field.
I watched a friend of mine after she had Rose cut her cords and from her viewpoint it was a miracle, issues with another person that seemed like they would never resolve themselves disappeared within an hour. After watching what was going on with my friend for awile I decided to have the cords cut with my former husband. I had gotten to the point where I was just sick of having him in my brain as a sense of my own shame.
After Rose cut the cords it was unvelievable how things changed. It was like everytime I thought about him there was teflon coating the situation, my thoughts slipped off the issue naturally. The best thing about it was that it left only the love, on a spiritual level, and the supposed grievances from my point of view no longer had any power over me. Freedom to be sure. So after my experience I know the power of this is amazing and not something to be done by a dabbler unless you don’t want results.
Thanks, Leslie. That teflon idea is superb. And thank you for aiding and abetting my search for quality control in this healing specialty.
Here’s something that came up over the past few weeks. One way of being a good sport during a session with me — or, I suspect, having a session with others who do aura readings, spiritual reading, any kind of intuitive reading — is to NOT have that glass of wine before your session.
It would seem weird to me to post a NO DRINKING requirement at my website when explaining about all the many types of session I offer. But please do not be like a client I had who thought that imbibing a glass of wine would help in some way.
Wine may make a person feel relaxed, but it makes energy fields wobbly, harder to read, and a bit more challenging to heal than needs to be.
If you must celebrate with spirits, save them until afterwards. Yes, even that can o’ beer, please.
Do prescription medications ever pose similar problems? I know people cannot just not take prescribed medicines, but a lot of prescription medications are just as potent as non-prescription drugs.
RYAN, when you have skill, prescription medicines can’t stop you from reading an aura or empathically merging with anyone you like — as I’ll bet you know, being topnotch at doing both.
However, medications can throw an aura out of whack in fascinating ways. So I definitely agree with you that they are potent and can, while taken, significiantly distort the functioning of auras.
You, and other Blog-Buddies may know that I have just one specialty in the general category of being a Medical Intuitive. I call it EMPATHIC PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY. And yes, I’m serious.
The specialty means that I can provide perspective about psychiatric medications, doing empathic merges with one databank after another to compare the effects of different medication choices for depression, anxiety, etc. for a particular client.
It’s as though each psychiatric medication opens a gateway within some aura databanks, shuts down functioning within others.
By doing research of this kind, you can provide a real alternative to the Guinea Pig method, whereby a psychiatrist or physician chooses a drug based on a combination of stated effects and probabilities, then lets the patient “try and see” and, if the problems are so severe that the patient complains, then do another “try and see.”
It’s a cruel method, and not necessary when there are so many talented empaths, including that RYAN fellow.
I have felt honored to be of service to some clients in this way, and I do believe that research like this has an important place in prescribing psychiatric medication.
If any of you Blog-Buddies knows of a researcher who can set up a study about this, please let this information be known. I would like nothing better than to be in this type of research, and train others to do it, as well.