Oh yes, don’t you mean the “right leaning” or nose angled to the right is the fame trait?

DANA, superb reading! Thank you.

Could you elaborate a bit more about your statement above “Yes, in its own weird way, karma like this is absolutely fair”?

Do you mean that Britney and Angelina have attracted all the fans/money/success for karmic reasons rather than for present-life talent reasons? (And that more talented, less outwardly-successful people do not because…. why…?)

Jodie at 14 – I also noticed that she was actively and smartly reading situations to determine what she should say and how to act.

At 26 – I noticed a lot more control in her communication, but I also sensed a “tightness” meaning for me that she is trusting people less here.

At 34 – She is communicating with so much passion and intensity in this movie, and communicating very concentrated ideas and messages, what I called “pinpointed.” I think this is why I had said that Contact “moved” me so much as a movie; I was feeling the focused and intense thoughts/ideas she was expressing.

At 46 – I read here how she is communicating more with her body. Rose had said in the Abigail Breslin post that Foster’s role of physical comedian in Nim’s Island was one in which Foster wasn’t as comfortable as more brainy roles. I, too, read that she was trying and was more aware of her physicality.

I was also curious how her use of intellect changed in the various roles from 14-46. So I will call this the “Use of Intellect while Acting” databank at her Third Chakra.

14 – Her intellect is in balance here with other aspects of her aura. I noticed the lack of STUFF as compared to her later roles, which Rose talked about later. She seems spunky here and having fun.

26 – In this very intense role her intellect is being channeled into her communication.

36 – She was able to spread her wings more intellectually, thinking and being in ways that stretched her mind some. Still, her focus is on forceful communication. I had written down that she is “almost trying to prove something,” which Rose more aptly described as, “By now, Jodie has more of a personal investment in being praised, appreciated, loved through her career” and “She wants reactions to this performance in order to make herself feel better.”

46 – A lot of her energy in this role is going into her personality, which for me means the social movie role she is projecting. I also sensed her very large intellect and how it isn’t really being used for the role, again, as Rose had noted before.

p.s. I so appreciated the hilarious analogies of acting or singing talent between Jodie Foster and Angelina Jolie and between Britney Spears and Loreena McKennitt. It was like an elephant in the room for me. I thought, “I’m so glad someone said it!”

When people worry that life isn’t fair — and I have certainly been one of those people on occasion — one problem with fairness is that the scope for evaluating “fair” is greater than the present lifetime.

Karma, therefore, is one of life’s deep ongoing mysteries, along with Life Contracts, astrology, etc. Given all that a person brings into this lifetime, certain levels of success are more likely than others.

Certainly, the more you read auras, the more you will be able to perceive talent in a performer, a composer, a person with any job at all.

Based on your experience, you will soon notice that Jodie Foster has more acting talent in her right pinky than you will find in the entire, venerated, person of Angelina Jolie.

Britney Spears may have more musical talent than you or me, but compared to Loreena McKennitt, she is about as gifted as a frog.

Maybe it sounds harsh to put this so bluntly, but Britney and Angelina can content themselves with enormous celebrity, wealth, and millions more fans than either Loreena or Jodie. Fair? Yes, in its own weird way, karma like this is absolutely fair.

But does it feel fair to the person who seems to have less? Maybe not.