Rose Rosetree 

  • Categories

  • * * *
  • Archives

  • * * *
    * * *

    Subscribe to our list and receive "Reading Life Deeper". Submit your email address below. We will not sell or rent your email address.

    "Reading Life Deeper" is Rose's free monthly newsletter, bringing you face readings and aura readings of people in the news. READ A SAMPLE.

    William and Kate’s portraits, shocking to Aura Readers

    December 15th, 2010 by Rose Rosetree

    What is wrong with this picture?

    Sure, I could go all gooey, like any admirer of young love and the Royals. What’s not to like about the new faux casual portrait of Prince William and Kate Middleton?

    Well, plenty. Actually.

    More specifically, there’s an absence of something. Can you see it/not see it?

    Here’s a hint. Check out this comparison photo, the similar engagement photo with William’s beloved mother, Lady Diana, plus Prince Charles. 

    Back in the day, when Shy Di hadn’t yet become the most photographed woman in history, she posed for a delightful engagement photo with Prince Charles.

    People Magazine editors, and plenty of others, have noticed the similarities between these two portraits.

    Similar positions. The same ring. Parallel displays. So sweet!

    Hey, aura readers, get to work. Use any form of energetic literacy you like to check out the fiancee in each portrait.  (Although I do recommend that you do an aura reading rather than an empath merge, for reasons that will soon become obvious.)

    Specifically, aura read this: 

    Connection to her physical body, aura reading databank at the root chakra.

    Diana Spencer, engaged:

    25 feet.

    Sensuous. Well grounded into physical reality through her body. Friendly. Enjoying life through her body.

    Kate Middleton, engaged:

    5 inches.

    Trying really, really hard to look pretty. Trying to look adorable. And very hungry.

    Kate’s body is an object that she treats a certain way in order to obtain a certain result. Make no mistake. This is a master-servant relationship, with Kate’s physical body the starved and willing servant to the owner’s strong ambitions.

    How Diana changed, down to her chakra databanks

    Do you remember watching the televised royal wedding? Hearing Kiri te Kanawa sing? So beautiful!

    Do you also remember, as I do, a famous TV interview several years into the marriage? Diana was asked, oh-so-politely, if she had become too thin?

    Oh, no. Not that.

    I remember watching Charles play the part of a doting husband, although later it would be known to all who cared that he had been unfaithful with (his now official wife) Camilla, unfaithful right from the start. While Diana’s eating disorder hadn’t yet seemed like public property, as so much of her life would become.

    Back then, I took it all on trust. Prince Charles and Lady Diana spoke the truth.

    Sure. Back then, I didn’t stop to read auras from photographs.

    Only years later did I experiment with a comparison aura reading. Wrinkles Are God’s Makeup contains a contrasting pair of photos of Lady Diana. I read that same chakra databank explored above.

    You can try it with the pix on Page 38. Here I’ll use an Internet photo I was able to find. Similar info, unfortunately.

    Connection to her physical body, aura reading databank at the root chakra

    Lady Diana,as  one more starved celebrity

    3 inches.

    The body is an object. Diana is habitually detached from noticing this body, with its usual hunger. This is a very emotionally charged, rather cruel, and complex relationship. What the body wants is never allowed to matter as much as how the body looks.

    The only diet secret you’ll ever need

    Kathy Griffin, willing to starve for her art

    Want to become as thin as Lady Diana? Or Kate Middleton? How about developing a “smokin’ bikini bod” to compete with Kathy Griffin?

    When Franz Kafka wrote “The Hunger Artist,” he had no idea what was coming… hoardes of celebrity wannabes for whom anorexia is a job requirement.

    Griffin’s art form, of course, is “Being a celebrity.” So, of course, she has used her struggles with weight to shock her audience. I admire the honesty in Kathy Griffin’s sharing her universal weightloss secret:

     ”It’s starvation and frustration. I’m hungry all the time, and I’m cranky” Kathy Griffin has said.

    Of course, the way to become this thin is, quite simply, starvation.

    Diana discovered this secret a few years into her loveless marriage. Prince William, who had his pick of women, has probably never dated a female who allowed herself to eat normally.

    I don’t mean to fault the dapper young prince. In terms of body language, William is giving Kate a genuine cuddle in their official “casual” engagement photograph. Compare that to the imperious look Prince Charles bestowed upon his virginal bride.

    But why has the culture changed to such a degree that 20 pounds could have been a deal breaker? Why do celebrity wannabes have to starve themselves? And why does nobody bother to notice?

    Certainly Kate Middleton has the discipline to meet this celeb job requirement. Just look at this elegant engagement photograph. What does Kate have in common with, say, the chandelier?

    Ah, such elegance! Just as the chandelier’s “body” is made of slim tubes, check out the body encased in that dress. Remember that any photograph adds 10 pounds. How much does the white dress add? Plenty more.

    Where is Kate’s body in this body?

    Sure, this self-starvation is what we call “elegant” today. But we could call it something else, to. We could call it “a problem.”

    How you can help

    All over the Internet, not just here, readers can comment. What if people like us, “little people,” people with normal-sized bodies, were to start lodging complaints?

    What if we started commenting, every chance we got:

    • “Why is she so thin?”
    • Or “Anorexia shouldn’t have to be a job requirement.”
    • Or “I don’t find starvation sexy.”

    Could we change the culture? I think we could. Even commenting about the surface of life could make a difference.

    Of course, one reason why I teach Deeper Perception — energetic literacy – is this:

    When everyone can read auras from photos, everyone will be able to hear the screams from the likes of Kate Middleton (only to become increasingly shrill through the decades).

    We can empath merge with, or aura read, the screams from Lady Diana and the grim jokester Kathy Griffin. Chakra databanks of these starving women say the same thing:

    “Feed me. Please. I’m so hungry.”

    [Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

    21 Comments on “William and Kate’s portraits, shocking to Aura Readers”

    1
    Eartha said:

    Hi Rose, I recently found your blog and wanted to comment on this post. I’m raising a 12-year-old daughter and this issue of body image is like a Goliath in our culture. So much pressure for our young women to try and be everyone except who they are – so much so that they lose their connection to themselves.

    First I will say that I read the energy around the photos (I don’t know much about reading auras). My first impressions on the photo with William and Kate are that I feel he has a genuine affection for her, he seems more comfortable and emotionally connected to her.

    However, when I look at Kate, she feels very uncomfortable. It seems that she’s almost pulling away. I feel almost like she hasn’t really connected with him because expectations from the public, her family and mostly the ones she’s placing on herself.

    She is a beautiful young woman, and I do wish them the best. It’s an interesting contrast to Charles and Diana. Diana gives the impression of being more connected to Charles, where he seems most connected to himself.

    William leans into his fiancée. Diana leans into her fiancé. Kate pulls backM doesn’t feel connected. Charles stands tall and “important”.

    Interesting study!

    December 15th, 2010 at 11:46 am
    2
    Heather Crawford said:

    This post has absolultely touched me, Rose. I have tears in my eyes.

    I have, since high school, struggled with my self worth being dependant upon my body image.

    Years of denying what I want to eat, all in the effort to look “good.” And for what? My husband loves me no matter what, and I truly believe this.

    I have been heavy and I have been stick thin. But he has remained by my side.

    I literally drive myself NUTS over this whole topic. Why can’t I just love myself, 15 lbs heavier or not?

    I have done consoling, read self-help books…every “diet: known to man. I still deem my self value on what I look like. And I am ashamed of this! There is so much more to life, and I know this but cannot break out of this way of thinking!

    Rose, what do you suggest would be a good type of session with you to heal this type of pain/STUFF?

    And how do we, as Americans, break out of this horrible cycle?! All we are bombarded with on a daily basis are stick-thin celebrities. In every movie. Every magazine. Every TV show!

    And I feel like this is a big part of why I still think this way about body image. Very VERY frustrating :(

    December 15th, 2010 at 1:13 pm
    3
    Elaine Warfield said:

    When I saw the “cuddle” photo, what first struck me was that William seemed to be embracing (claiming) Kate, and Kate almost seemed to be pulled back a bit. Almost like a stiff type of embrace.

    December 15th, 2010 at 2:00 pm
    4
    Amanda Flood said:

    That’s interesting. My first reaction to their photo was how thin she looked, thinner than I’ve ever seen her (I’ve taken a little interest over the years). And you’re right about the camera adding pounds, it’s genuinely shocking when you look at her legs.

    All that strain just to look good in the public perception makes me sad.

    Lovely to see the early photo of Diana. She was so very innocent and open then.

    Amanda

    December 15th, 2010 at 2:46 pm
    5

    EARTHA, welcome to our blog community. What a perceptive reading.

    BTW, as far as I’m concerned, there isn’t a big difference between reading someone’s “energy” and reading someone’s “aura.”

    True, the former can be done vaguely, what I call “Stage 1 Energetic Literacy.” But you’re doing something very Stage 3 with your Energetic Literacy.

    Maybe all of us together can make a difference in that crazy anorexia culture, for the sake of all our precious children (as well as our own wholeness).

    December 15th, 2010 at 4:01 pm
    6

    Aw, HEATHER, you aren’t at all alone in having had body image problems. And I’m glad that you have come to appreciate that trying new diets isn’t going to move out the STUFF.

    The first way I would help would be a phone session of Aura Healing and Transformation. There might be several sessions’ worth of cords of attachment to authority figures, ex-lovers, etc.

    Their views about body image may have continued to work through your subconscious mind 24/7. And would stop when the related cord of attachment is permanently removed.

    Another possiblity is Energy Release Regression Therapy, which can help move out long-term patterns related to weight and body image. You can read about that, with plenty of articles, at this part of my website:

    http://www.rose-rosetree.com/RTBenefits.htm#WeightLoss

    Other articles about this type of Past-Life Regression Therapy can be found here:

    http://www.rose-rosetree.com/RegressionTherapy.htm

    Energy Release Regression Therapy, unlike my other sessions, must be done in person, here in the suburbs of Washington, D.C., in Sterling, Virginia.

    Although some clients do like to start there, I recommend starting with at least one phoner because the healing can work more efficiently that way.

    Hopes this helps, HEATHER.

    December 15th, 2010 at 4:07 pm
    7
    Heather Crawford said:

    Thank you so much for that information, Rose. It helps tremendously and I appreciate you taking the time to explain :)

    And I do apologize as this doesn’t have much to do with this post but I’m having a hard time deciding what to have you heal first! Lol decisions decisions…

    I’m not worried about what STUFF there is, I just can’t decide what clean up first!

    Do a lot of your clients have this problem?

    December 15th, 2010 at 4:33 pm
    8

    HEATHER, it’s a common problem. But doesn’t stay one for long, because you can have zero performance pressure as my client.

    Bring an intention to your session and then we’ll work things out as we proceed. We can talk!

    I’m very committed to helping you during your session, so your time won’t be wasted. And moving out any STUFF creates room for you to enjoy your life as you.

    December 15th, 2010 at 5:49 pm
    9
    Cheryl said:

    Hi Rose !!!

    I love this article so much…!!..

    Kate was not relaxed/tense ..not completely comfortable with being pulled in by William somewhat tightly..:)..She is very thin…

    I think that being “hungry” speaks to the soul…if the soul is fed well then some of the body issues can being to heal themselves also…

    AND Rose!!!..I want to thank you for yesterday and let Heather know that there are no performance pressures !!!…

    You gave me so much :) Thank you !!!! Cheryl

    December 16th, 2010 at 11:13 am
    10
    Heather Crawford said:

    Awww Rose…thank you so much! I was forgetting the important part that moving out ANY STUFF helps!! I’ll set the intention and go from there :)

    And thank you so much for your time and the beautiful work you do to help people help themselves around the world!

    December 16th, 2010 at 12:25 pm
    11
    primrose said:

    I think women especially can make a huge difference to the anorexia culture, by healing themselves of their food obsessions and not passing that self-hatred onto their children.

    And it would be helpful too if fathers stopped emotionally incesting/sexually abusing their daughters. The “terrifying male gaze” that playes havoc with a girl’s self-esteem is usually in the anorectic mix.

    December 16th, 2010 at 9:28 pm
    12
    Ashley said:

    Hello everyone. I want to make some comments as someone who is naturally thin.

    Since puberty, the time other people start to scrutinize our bodies, I have been criticized for being too thin. It sucks. Being younger and more vulnerable, it hurt my self-esteem and I tried to make up for it by doubling the amount of food I ate. I was still in puberty so my metabolism was rocketing. I gained a little weight, but only by eating more food than was comfortable.

    I also would get a lot of anger from people who were overweight. For me, this was also hurtful. I never reveled in being thin. Like them, I just wanted more acceptance of my body!

    Nowadays, I have accepted that I am just naturally small. Not just thin, I’m also small boned. I don’t diet. I eat Nutella on buttered toast everyday. I mostly eat what I want, but like a lot of people, I have to temper my love for junk food and if I don’t watch it I won’t have room for more nutritious food.

    I also happen to have a cool illusion trick for looking thin. My body stores a lot of my weight in my calves. I don’t, and never will, have cute little filly horse calves like you can see on even overweight women. My calves are more like clydesdale horses I sometimes joke.

    I would hate to be famous and have to explain my weight to a public that deemed it wasn’t socially acceptable, whether that’s too fat or too thin.

    In this case, I know we are discussing women who are starving themselves. I agree that women feeling pressured to starve themselves to reach a specific ideal is heartbreaking. My point is that whether you are starving yourself or getting breast implants (and now butt implants! sheesh) this society really has a limited view on what beauty is.

    I have this beautiful belly dance teacher who was drawn to the dance because in its country of origin it embraces women of all body types — all are beautiful and God never makes an ugly creature.

    By the way, I just happened to pick a dance where I REALLY get a lot of comments about being too skinny. Belly dancers are “expected” to be jiggly and have curves! Oy vey!

    December 17th, 2010 at 4:34 am
    13
    Patricia said:

    My first reaction to the photo was noticing how flirty and coy Kate looked, in a way that didn’t seem like her.

    I’ve seen her in photos before but not like this, with such an obvious “pose” that looks designed to please and win followers.

    Definitely a photo to appear on tabloid and supermarket magazines! Not a high degree of authenticity, in other words :)

    December 17th, 2010 at 1:15 pm
    14

    ASHLEY, thank you for this courageous and thought-provoking share.

    God never makes an ugly creature. I agree!

    And we also have the right to use free will to make ourselves into whatever kind of creature we desire, whether through temporary clothes and makeup or through long-term lifestyle changes or those (I agree, weird) butt implants.

    Someone’s size isn’t usually ANYONE’s business. But I am doing a bit of speaking out these days about The Anorexic Ideal and people who volunteer to become celebrities.

    I don’t believe they should have the “job requirement” of self-starvation. Any more than you need to have the job of pouffing yourself out because you happen to be yourself.

    December 17th, 2010 at 2:43 pm
    15
    Cheryl said:

    Hi Rose..

    I applaud you for speaking out against The Anorexic Ideal…it is such a horrible illness, difficult to treat and it kills…so why why why does society encourage such an image ??

    I also want thank you for your previous post which encourages us to speak out about celebrity starvation…:)

    December 17th, 2010 at 3:01 pm
    16
    Anon said:

    Let me begin by saying that I truly appreciate the blog you keep. I find it fun to read and oftentimes am intrigued by some of the personal readings – all of which I appreciate enjoying. :)

    So it is for these reasons that I’m genuinely surprised and a bit upset to read this post.

    I understand the importance of talking about self-starvation in general, as well as about the intense pressure on celebrities to maintain a certain body type.

    However, body shape and the struggles that go along with it can be intensely private, and to discuss someone’s body – especially someone who has begun the process of really stepping into a heaping amount of public pressure and spotlight – seems disrespectful.

    Just because the body is an aspect of us that is visible to others around us does not mean it is a topic for public discussion.

    If someone chooses to discuss their body publicly, then they have given permission or understanding that others will probably comment on it. However, to speak about someone’s body who has not given such permission strikes me as disrespectful and violating.

    To me, it is besides the point that she (Kate Middleton) has stepped into the role of “celebrity”. Celebritism is not synonymous with releasing all rights to privacy and personal life.

    On another note, imagine people did start talking about her weight. Perhaps that would be a good thing; perhaps she would find it helpful, perhaps it would propel her to get help (should she need it). Or perhaps she is not ready for that – then what?

    I generally very much appreciate and enjoy the chakra readings on your blog, Rose, but I believe this one oversteps boundaries. While your intentions seem genuine and golden, I just don’t see how this is more valuable or helpful than it might be harmful and a violation of one’s rights and privacy.

    Thank you otherwise for your wonderful spirit and dedication to the topic. I agree with you – it is strange that such a strict range of body weight is a primary aspect of a job description, and even more disturbing that it is so commonly accepted and taken for normal in our world.

    December 23rd, 2010 at 5:05 am
    17

    ANON, what a lovely Comment #17. You didn’t just make a fair case for not reading Kate Middleton but everything about your reasoning and tone was so congruent.

    Glad to have someone so civilized in our online community. :-)

    Many would agree with your idea that becoming a celebrity does not mean a person necessarily relinquishes all rights to privacy.

    Look, I’m all for privacy. I would like a constitutional amendment passed here in the U.S. to guarantee the right to privacy.

    But even then, I don’t think it would apply when people sext their friends, then discover the photos don’t disappear.

    The right to privacy wouldn’t apply if someone personally posts onto Facebook or even this blog.

    And, like it or not, in any age, celebrities do relinquish privacy when they publish publicity photos – and these are all I have read here, Kate’s official publicity portraits taken with one of the most famous men in all of England.

    Realistically, I don’t think that Prince William’s position, wealth, and fame escaped her notice.

    Nor do I think that he ignored Kate Middleton’s fulfilling a job requirement for “princess” these days.

    December 28th, 2010 at 11:41 pm
    18
    D. said:

    Hi Rose,

    I am new to your blog, and I’ve just recently realized I’m an empath. I apologize for being so contrarian so soon, because I am really enjoying your blog and all that I’m learning. But, this is an issue I have a hard time ignoring.

    I agreed with almost all you said, until I got to “How you can help.” I feel this is a very unfair call to action, for a few reasons. First, I find it condemning. People struggling with eating disorders are already feeling attacked. Hearing more criticism only pushes them deeper into a hole. Anorexia is about literally reducing yourself to avoid as much criticism and attack as possible. Let’s help her, and others, in a more accepting and loving way.

    Second, while I do agree that she is in a master-slave relationship with her body, we also don’t know how much other factors such as metabolism and nerves contribute to her thinness.

    Third, let’s not make “skinny” a bad thing. Some women (myself included) are naturally this way. If I start exercising regularly, as per conventional health advice, you can see every bone in my body – and I have a hearty appetite. I am in no way disagreeing that this mania for skinniness has to end. But, condemning this body type is just as bad as condemning curviness.

    What if, instead of commenting negatively on Kate, we applaud those celebrities who eat healthfully and are happy with the results, no matter what they may be?

    Rose, thanks again for this and other posts. I’m truly learning a lot and you’ve already helped me tremendously.

    October 20th, 2011 at 10:14 am
    19

    D., welcome to this blog. And thank you for coming in courageously with your own truth.

    I love everything you said and am glad that you said it.

    I am honored to be able to help you. Helping and raising consciousness is the point of this blog. And self-authority, or believing in YOUR own truth, is my highest value as a writer, teacher, and healer.

    So keep those comments flowing, and don’t worry about labels like “contrarian,” please.

    October 20th, 2011 at 1:20 pm
    20
    D. said:

    Thank you, Rose. That was a really nice message.

    I actually have some feelings about Kate Middleton I’d love to bounce off you. Every time I look at that rmgagement picture I’m blown away by the repelling force I feel from Kate.

    My sense of her has always been this: I think Prince William inadvertantly married his mother. Despite all these composed, polite images we see of Kate, i think by nature shes a bit wild. I think this is a girl who likes to party. Now that she’s accepted this role, and even before when they were dating, she knows she has to contain herself and so shes playing the demure woman behind the man. In that picture I see the resulting intense anxiety. It looks like she feels very suffocated in his arms, knowing that shes in a role that doesnt suit her with high stakes. I also think she doesnt really know herself, and probably accepted William’s advances because how can you refuse royalty?? She probsbly figured that this was a coveted role, and had to take it.

    October 20th, 2011 at 10:50 pm
    21

    D., seems to me you are really on the cusp of studying deeper perception. You might want to start with face reading, which is where I began.

    What’s the difference between your interesting speculation, shared with us here, and doing face reading, aura reading, or a Skilled Empath Merge?

    Theories are just that, whether intended for insight as your ideas here were, or projection, or a kind of speculation leveled at people disliked, a.k.a. “gossip.”

    If you continue reading this blog, I think the difference will become clearer to you.

    You will find loads of blogs and chat rooms where people share their perceptive theories, and many online places dedicated to psychic development, but no other blog I know of dedicated to deeper perception with energetic literacy.

    By contrast,
    That perceptiveness

    October 21st, 2011 at 12:29 pm
     
     

    Leave a comment


    ^ Top


    Ask First
     
  • Blogroll

  • Energy Spirituality, Emotional and Spiritual Healing